Soyuz TMA-M review: Tim Peak on his 28,590kph spacecraft

By topgear, 29 December 2020

OVERVIEW - What is it?

It’s a rocketship. And an actual rocketship, not a lazy attempt to try and describe the performance of a 600bhp saloon as a launch control system shortens the life of its drivetrain.

Until Space X returned space travel to America’s east coast in 2020, a Soyuz was your only way to get aboard the International Space Station. The Soyuz family of spacecraft have been blasting astronauts (and supplies, and equipment…) off into orbit since the mid-Sixties and they’re the most commonly used launch vehicle on Earth. We can’t speak for the other planets just yet.

Between NASA ending the Space Shuttle programme in 2011 and a Falcon 9 launching humans from Cape Canaveral in May 2020, Russia’s Soyuz was how we got men and women into space, including British astronaut Tim Peake. He took off on the 128th Soyuz mission – space flight TMA-19M – from Kazakhstan’s Baikonur Cosmodrome in December 2015. He spent one hour shy of 186 days in space with Yuri Malenchenko and Timothy Kopra before they undocked from the ISS and returned safely to Earth in June 2016.

It was actually the Soyuz TMA-M’s penultimate mission, and one month after Peake and Co. returned home, it’d been superseded. Progress and tech updates in space travel are even more ruthless than in the world of RS, M Division and AMG, it seems…

Its replacement, the Soyuz MS, is still in service, but unlike its forebear, it essentially has an arch rival in the form of Space X’s Falcon 9, which is what we’ll likely see Peake go back into space aboard if he returns – as hoped – in the mid 2020s.

A Soyuz comprises many parts, but it only resembles a rocket for a short while after launch countdown reaches zero. The satellite shape you see in the main image above is how the TMA-M looks for the vast majority of its mission, and it’s split into three sections – the service module, orbital module and descent module. Of all the wildly expensive and technical kit that got Peake to space, only the descent module survived its trip and still exists (you can see it in London’s Science Museum). Talk about a short shelf life.

But to get those three segments into space, you need to screw the TMA-M atop some firepower. And this is where Soyuz begins to look long and pointy again. The ‘first stage’ comprises the four rocket boosters around the outer edge, weighing almost 45 tonnes apiece (including fuel) and with a burn time of two minutes following lift off, after which they’re jettisoned. At this point, the crew will be 41,500 metres – or 26 miles – in the sky.


“The launch is unbelievable,” says Peake. “In terms of that initial feeling of raw power lifting you off the launchpad, it’s hard to describe what nine million horsepower feels like, it’s just unbelievable.”

Then you’re onto the long, cylindrical, solo ‘second stage’ rocket that weighs around 105 tonnes fuelled. It ignites at launch and burns for another three minutes after the first stage (4m48s in total), quadrupling the Soyuz’s altitude to 176,000 metres (109 miles) in the process.

Once this has done its job, it’s automatically cut free from the spacecraft by the ignition of the ‘stage three’ engine, by which point the Soyuz is in space, horizontal rather than vertical, and it’s being directed on its way to orbit, its 17,765mph top speed, and the ISS. At which point we ought to hand over to somebody who’s actually been there, a certain Mr Peake…

DRIVING - What is it like on the road?

“The first stage of the rocket launch is all about noise,” says Tim Peake. “What’s more fun, I think, is the third stage when you’re already up in space, you’ve already got the altitude, and the rocket is horizontal. That’s when you’re accelerating to 25 times the speed of sound.

“You’ve already had about four minutes of getting up into space, now you’re still doing 4g and you’ve got four minutes of horizontal 4g acceleration. That’s an awful long time. Even after 30 seconds you’re thinking ‘that’s enough, surely!’

“With anything I’d driven or flown before then, my mind was able to comprehend the speed. Even if I’m in a fast jet or a racing car, my mind is able to compute. In that rocket you can’t. It’s not beyond your comfort zone, because you’re actually enjoying it – you’re smiling – but you’ve gone beyond the point you can comprehend how fast you’re going.

“The g forces build up quite gradually, though, so by the time you’re doing 4g – yeah, it feels like you’re doing 4g, but it’s not slamming into you. It’s arguably more aggressive on a racetrack in a car, when you’re going 170mph (274kph) and hit the brakes.

“You’re probably doing 4g of braking but it’s instantaneous so you’re getting subjected to quite strong g forces very, very quickly. In a rocket, the moment you get a really sudden g force isn’t launch, it’s when the third stage rocket cuts out and you go from about 4.5g to zero g in a fraction of a second. That’s a massive jolt.”

It’s at this point the Soyuz is no longer what we know as a rocket, as it looks leaving Earth, but like a seven-tonne, seven-metre-long satellite that’ll dock with the ISS. And then stay parked there for as long as its astronauts are orbiting Earth doing their job (still at nearly 18,000mph (28,968kph), we should add). Six months, in the case of Peake and his flight mates Yuri Malenchenko and Timothy Kopra. But what’s the journey back home like?

“Deceleration to 5g re-entry is actually pretty gradual and it builds up really, really gently,” says Peake. “Actually all through re-entry is quite a gentle experience. You’ve got a lot of noise going on – lots of wind rush outside the capsule – and you’ve got a lot of heat, so you’re sweating inside and it does become hard to breathe with all the g force.

“What’s really, really aggressive is when the parachute opens. You’re still just going over the speed of sound and these braking chutes come out first; it’s very, very violent and the capsule is swung around – you get about 20 seconds of complete rollercoaster feeling – then the main canopy opens with a big jolt as well. That’s the bit that’s really quite violent. The eight minutes of coming through Earth’s atmosphere is uncomfortable, but it’s not aggressive.”

ON THE INSIDE - Layout, finish and space

The Soyuz spacecraft’s cabin is hot and sweaty on re-entry, then, but what about the rest of the time? Well, there’s no 18-way adjustable seats or Apple CarPlay, but there’s more than enough other buttons to keep you occupied on a six-hour journey to space. Our picture here shows astronauts in a Soyuz training capsule in Star City, Moscow, as there’s not really the room – nor spare astronaut capacity – to photograph this during an actual trip to the ISS.

While space is clearly at a premium, the Soyuz capsule is a big step up from the command module which transported Neil Armstrong & Co on the Apollo missions of the Sixties and Seventies, though; 50 per cent more living space – nine cubic metres versus six – while weighing less overall. It hosts three people and can support them for up to 30 days, significantly longer than they’ll spend in the Soyuz if all goes to plan.


Potassuium superoxide chambers aboard the craft take the carbon dioxide and water emitted by its passengers, turning them back into oxygen while syphoning off the leftover CO2. It’s a techier version of pressing the ‘air recirculate’ button on your air con when you’re stuck behind an old van pumping out black smoke.

This TMA-M, introduced in 2011, replaced lots of analogue equipment with digital to save around 70kg on the Soyuz models that went before it, as well as bringing more passenger space, thus allowing astronauts and cosmonauts over six foot to go to the ISS, with a wider range of shapes and sizes now accommodated – anyone between 4ft 11in and 6ft 3in in height, and 50kg and 95kg in weight.


OWNING - Running costs and reliability

Running costs might not be your immediate concern when it comes to space travel, but owing to such scientific endeavours being fed by taxpayer’s money, they’re a huge consideration.

The cost of a launch – and launch fuel – isn’t something you’ll find out without strong security clearances on your Star City access card, but reports suggest NASA was paying around $80million [approx. RM324 million) per seat when it was sending Americans to space on Soyuz between the Shuttle’s retirement and Space X human transportation era.

Each Soyuz burns through 157 tonnes of propellant at launch – pump that much premium grade petrol at your local filling station, and as well as making the cashier quite cross, you’ll also amass a bill of around £280,000 [approx. RM1.53 million] (while setting a new world record for Nectar points). Space rockets swallow something a little stronger than 98 ron, though: a mixture of kerosene and liquid oxygen.

If you’re a user of The Internet, you’ve likely seen Space X’s reusable rocket boosters, which are sent free of the Falcon 9 rocket and land politely back on a platform out at sea. This is doubtless the more sustainable future of space travel, but it’s not one Peake’s Soyuz space craft lived in.

So ‘owning’ is a concept that doesn’t really last for long – only one segment of the TMA-M spacecraft returned from space, and it now sits in a museum covered in scorch marks. Not one with much value on the second-hand market, then. ‘Never raced or rallied, but it has been through the Earth’s atmosphere twice and nonchalantly crashed into a desert.’

The filling up of space with idle bits of craft is a cause Peake cares deeply about, though. “What I think we need to be very careful of is the space environment,” he says. “We need to have better regulations to control it from now on, and to clean up all the debris we have put up there in the last 60 years. That’s something we need to be better at.

“All these massive constellations we’re launching now, of thousands of small satellites, we need to be very, very careful that that doesn’t pollute the space environment for future generations. As long as they have a means of coming back to Earth and burning up – destroying themselves somehow and not polluting the space environment – that’s what we need to be careful about.

“But the good news is that most of these small satellites are tiny. We used to have to launch a satellite the size of a London bus – big, heavy things – but now we can do it much cheaper, much smaller, and there are some great companies out there. Skyrora, who are a UK company, are working on very eco-friendly rocket fuel and friendlier methods of launching to space. The space industry is moving in the right direction in terms of environmental friendliness.”


Nine million horsepower, 17,765mph (28,590kph) top speed, and zero to 3,500mph (5,633kph) in two minutes. With those sorts of figures, we can’t score the Soyuz TMA-M and its rocket boosters anything less than the full ten.

Space exploration is a vastly evolving enterprise, though, so while Soyuz – and its Baikonur launch pad – have determined how humans leave Earth for most of the 2010s, the 2020s have seen a new dawn of commercial space travel, most famously Space X and soon Boeing, provide a viable, perhaps more sustainable alternative.

Either way, space travel wins, with more choice than ever for how we get up there and explore. Much of it uniting nations that, on terra firma, don’t always get along. Soyuz, and its 50-odd years of service so far, has been a vital part of the journey.

“I’m very encouraged by what’s going on generally at the moment,” says Tim Peake. “You hear in the press ‘the US going back to the Moon’ but the reality is it’s very much an international collaboration. The service module for the Orion spacecraft is built by Europe. The same ISS collaboration is pretty much involved with that whole moon effort. And I’m a fan of that.

“I would love to see us get to Mars in my lifetime – and I think we will get to Mars in my lifetime – but going to the Moon is a sensible option. I do think when we go to the Moon it’s to stay; it’s not a two week trip, it’s to go there and have a permanent space station in orbit around the Moon, then permanent habitation modules on the surface doing proper research, finding out so much more about our nearest celestial body and what we can learn about Earth from what we find out there. That’s all great stuff in terms of science and research, but it’s also great stuff in terms of making it less risky to go to Mars.”

Nine million horsepower, 28,590kph top speed, zero to 5,633kph in two minutes. It's a solid ten


The world's most popular form of space travel It's a bit of a one-use wonder
SCORE 10/10


Photography: ESA/NASA/ESA - S. Corvaja